The way we educate young people today feels increasingly outdated — like a dinosaur model still lumbering along. And the cracks are showing. Violence, bullying, school refusal: signs that the system no longer fits the world our young people inhabit.
What if we imagined something different? Picture adolescents not shuffling from subject to subject in a daily smorgasbord, but instead focusing deeply, university-style. A lecture, assignments, projects — meaningful engagement. Students would learn to manage their time, to take responsibility, to become more independent.
This is not about removing face-to-face connection. Quite the opposite. It’s about blending: pod-based learning, group mentoring, peer-to-peer support, combined with online systems that allow flexibility and global reach. A student in one country could access learning in another. A student without local opportunities could still participate. Education becomes more equitable, more accessible.
Considered another way, hybrid delivery would be essential. These pod-based, peer-mentored groups and teacher facilitation would provide embodied, social interaction, while online systems would expand accessibility and global equity. Learners from less privileged contexts could access high-quality education beyond national boundaries, aligning with UNESCO’s (2021) calls for inclusive, lifelong, and digitally supported education.
In summary, a reimagined model must move beyond disciplinary “smorgasbords” and toward structures that cultivate depth, agency, and autonomy. One proposal is to align adolescent education with university-style formats: focused lectures, extended projects, and assignments that demand sustained engagement and self-management. Such a model situates students not as passive recipients but as active participants in their learning.
I can hear the critics: But what if a 15-year-old specialising in the arts never does biology? What if they miss physics? My response: we live in a world of saturation. Is bouncing from subject to subject really the best way to nurture a growing mind? Or would going deep — truly deep — be more effective?
It will feel scary. It will feel impossible. But remember: telling a growing, physical body five hundred years ago that it must sit at a desk from nine to three, every day, would also have seemed impossible. We created that model. And we can create another.
Nothing is impossible — if we believe it’s time. And I believe it’s time.
Moreover, lifelong learning pathways could permit subsequent re-specialisation, ensuring flexibility without diluting early engagement.
The impossibility lies not in the change itself but in the reluctance to imagine alternatives.
Until next time,
Dr Mon x
EDUCATOR8 
Leave a comment